On the Topic of A.I.G. Bonuses
It’s natural to feel wronged when you see your savings get cut in half or more due to a widespread economic downturn caused by irresponsible greed on Wall Street. It’s natural to feel misled and to seek out a scapegoat. It’s wrong to accuse and lynch workers in the financial industry– those who had very little to do with the cause of the economic downturn– simply because they make a lot of money.
The fiasco with the A.I.G. bonuses and the outrage expressed by the nation and its president are an example of the incredible ability and crippling need of the human mind to justify blame and, in some cases, deflect responsibility for the personal and corporate financial negligence that led to this financial crisis. Does anyone actually know the job responsibilities of the A.I.G. employees who received those bonuses? Do people even care whether or not their daily activities were related at all to credit default swaps? It is blind and foolish to assume that just because someone made a few million dollars in bonuses last year, that person is an evil criminal that leeches money from hard working tax payers.
Perhaps one reason it is so easy to villainize the executives we read about in the news is because we don’t personally know many such people. To most of us, the idea of making $1 million a year seems so incredulous that anyone who does it must somehow be cheating, breaking the rules, or doing something unethical. Perhaps part of that rationalization stems from a selfish desire that balks at the idea of anyone being many times more successful than oneself.
While the so-called moral outrage at the A.I.G. bonuses may provide good ratings for news outlets, any benefit that may arise from such emotional beatings of the chest are imaginary or psychological at best, and at worst, will only result in a distracted president and delayed solutions to the current economic quagmire.